Build an MFRM network review
Usage
build_mfrm_network_review(
fit = NULL,
diagnostics = NULL,
sparse_design = NULL,
peer_review_design = NULL,
top_n_subsets = NULL,
min_observations = 0,
top_n = 10,
include_graph = FALSE,
data = NULL,
person = NULL,
facets = NULL,
score = NULL,
basis = c("observed", "planned"),
weight = NULL
)Arguments
- fit
Output from
fit_mfrm().- diagnostics
Optional output from
diagnose_mfrm().- sparse_design
Optional sparse-design metadata. Supply either the generated data frame that carries the
mfrm_sparse_designattribute, the attribute itself, or a data frame with sparse design columns such asSparseDesignActive,DesignDensity,MinCommonPersonsPerRaterPair, andZeroCommonRaterPairs.- peer_review_design
Optional peer-review design metadata. Supply either the generated data frame that carries the
mfrm_peer_review_designattribute, the attribute itself, or itsoverviewdata frame.- top_n_subsets
Optional maximum number of connected-subset rows to retain before constructing the graph; passed to
mfrm_network_analysis().- min_observations
Minimum observations required to keep a subset row; passed to
mfrm_network_analysis().- top_n
Number of central/cut/bridge rows to retain in the review.
- include_graph
Logical; if
TRUE, keep the underlyingigraphobject in the nestedsource_networkbundle.- data
Optional raw assignment/rating data, supplied instead of
fit.- person, facets
Names of the person column and one or more facet columns in
data. Include only Rater infacetsto inspect person-rater links without a common Criterion node obscuring separate panels.- score
Numeric score column for
basis = "observed". Recode study-specific missing markers toNAfirst; no category recoding or estimation is done.- basis
"observed"includes rows with complete identifiers and nonmissing finite scores;"planned"includes complete assignment rows without scores. Planned networks requirescore = NULLandweight = NULL.- weight
Optional numeric weight column for observed raw data. Missing and zero-weight rows do not create edges. Edge weights still count rows, not sampling weights. Negative or infinite weights are refused.
Value
A bundle of class mfrm_network_review containing:
overview: connectedness and front-door review statusnetwork_summary: graph-level metrics frommfrm_network_analysis()facet_summary: facet-level vulnerability summariestop_central_nodes,top_cut_nodes,top_bridge_edges: follow-up rowssparse_review: optional sparse-design linking reviewpeer_review: optional peer-review assignment and linkage diagnosticsreporting_map: boundary between MFRM, design network, sparse design, peer-review design, and rater-effect network routes
Details
build_mfrm_network_review() is a synthesis layer over
mfrm_network_analysis(). It keeps the measurement model and graph view in
separate sections: MFRM estimates remain the measurement results, while the
network review summarizes co-observation connectedness and linking
vulnerability in the observed design. This is especially useful for sparse
or incomplete rater-mediated designs, where common-person links, connected
subsets, articulation points, and bridge edges can explain why an otherwise
estimable model depends on fragile design links.
The review status is deliberately conservative and descriptive. It is not a literature-derived adequacy cut point for fit, separation, recovery, or rater quality. Use it to decide which design links, anchors, or additional observations need inspection before making common-scale claims.
References
Wind, S. A., & Jones, E. (2018). The stabilizing influences of linking set size and model-data fit in sparse rater-mediated assessment networks. Educational and Psychological Measurement. doi:10.1177/0013164417703733.
Wind, S. A., Jones, E., & Grajeda, S. (2023). Does sparseness matter? Examining the use of generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in sparse rating designs. Applied Psychological Measurement, 47(5-6), 351-364. doi:10.1177/01466216231182148.
DeMars, C. E., Shapovalov, Y. A., & Hathcoat, J. D. (2023). Many-Facet Rasch Designs: How Should Raters be Assigned to Examinees? NCME presentation.
Before fitting
Supply data, person, facets and score instead of fit. Known levels
from incomplete/unscored rows remain as nodes, including isolates. A planned
assignment roster can be examined with basis = "planned"; absent assignments
cannot be reconstructed from an observed-only file. row_usage records each
input row's inclusion and first exclusion reason. With a fit, only its retained
rows are available here; review original missing assignments before fitting.
No prefit result supplies an identification audit or model-readiness decision.
settings$is_disjoint describes the source graph, even when subset filters
omit components; compare source/retained subset counts. Filters do not establish
linking. See vignette("mfrmr-networks-and-reporting") for a panel example.
Examples
# Saved synthetic JML/RSM analysis of example_core.
# For your own data, fit a model first; see ?fit_mfrm.
example_fit <- readRDS(system.file("examples", "core-jml.rds", package = "mfrmr"))
fit <- example_fit$fit
if (requireNamespace("igraph", quietly = TRUE)) {
review <- build_mfrm_network_review(fit)
summary(review)
build_summary_table_bundle(review)
}
#> mfrmr Summary Table Bundle
#>
#> Overview
#> Title SourceClass SummaryClass
#> Network Review Tables mfrm_network_review summary.mfrm_network_review
#> TablesAvailable TablesReturned AppendixPreset
#> 12 10 none
#>
#> Table index
#> Table Rows Cols Role
#> overview 1 14 network_review_overview
#> network_summary 1 16 network_design_summary
#> facet_summary 3 8 network_facet_vulnerability
#> top_central_nodes 10 11 network_central_nodes
#> top_cut_nodes 0 11 network_articulation_nodes
#> top_bridge_edges 0 12 network_bridge_edges
#> reporting_map 5 4 reporting_map
#> caveats 1 3 analysis_caveats
#> notes 4 1 interpretation_notes
#> settings 5 2 review_settings
#> Description
#> Front-door connectedness and design-network review status.
#> Graph-level connectedness, density, articulation-point, and bridge-edge metrics.
#> Facet-level aggregation of node centrality and design-link vulnerability.
#> Highest-betweenness design-network nodes for follow-up inspection.
#> Articulation-point rows whose removal would fragment the design graph.
#> Bridge-edge rows indicating one-link dependencies between graph regions.
#> Map separating MFRM measurement, design-network review, sparse-design review, peer-review design, and rater-effect network routes.
#> Interpretation caveats for network-design diagnostics.
#> Compact interpretation notes for network-design review.
#> Settings and provenance recorded by build_mfrm_network_review().
#>
#> Plot index
#> Table PlotReady NumericColumns DefaultPlotTypes
#> overview TRUE 9 numeric_profile, first_numeric
#> network_summary TRUE 14 numeric_profile, first_numeric
#> facet_summary TRUE 7 numeric_profile, first_numeric
#> top_central_nodes TRUE 7 numeric_profile, first_numeric
#> top_cut_nodes FALSE 7
#> top_bridge_edges FALSE 5
#> reporting_map FALSE 0
#> caveats FALSE 0
#> notes FALSE 0
#> settings FALSE 0
#>
#> Notes
#> - MFRM estimates remain the measurement-model results; network rows summarize observed design links.
#> - Articulation points and bridge edges identify levels or links whose removal would fragment the co-observation graph.
#> - Sparse-design review rows, when supplied, report planned-missingness and rater-link diagnostics rather than recovery or fit-readiness decisions.
#> - Peer-review design rows, when supplied, report assignment structure and reviewer linkage rather than reviewer quality or fairness.
#> - 2 empty table(s) were omitted from `tables`; use `include_empty = TRUE` to retain them.
