
Sampling uncertainty in G-study variance and covariance components
Source:R/api-multivariate-gstudy-intervals.R
confint.mfrm_multivariate_gstudy.RdAdd standard errors and confidence intervals to the variance components of one observed score, one prespecified weighted composite, or the covariance between two original scores. The default uses a complete balanced ANOVA G-study without refitting. Explicit experimental REML profiles also accept identifiable incomplete sources, fitting a separate normal model. Explicit residual contrasts provide residual-only intervals from retained used ratings, including incomplete sources, without likelihood fitting.
Usage
# S3 method for class 'mfrm_multivariate_gstudy'
confint(
object,
parm = NULL,
level = 0.95,
score = NULL,
weights = NULL,
assumption,
method = "auto",
draws = 20000L,
seed = 20261016L,
...
)Arguments
- object
A result from
mfrm_g_study()fitted withmethod = "anova". One or two crossed random facets, or the supported balanced nested design, are allowed. Withmethod = "reml_profile", variance and two-score covariance intervals also accept incomplete or unequal MINQUE(0) sources with their raw used ratings retained.method = "residual_contrast"accepts these sources for Residual only.- parm
Component names or integer positions to return;
NULLselects all components. Names are those inobject$components.- level
Pointwise confidence level strictly between zero and one.
- score
One original score name for variances (the default is the first score), or exactly two distinct original names for their covariance. With two names, explicitly select a covariance
methodbelow.- weights
Optional named numeric vector specifying one composite. Name every score once, with finite weights and at least one nonzero value. Weights are used as supplied, including signed weights for a difference score. Do not supply both
scoreandweights.- assumption
Required:
"normal"asserts independent normal random effects with constant component variances for the selected score or composite. Persons and the selected measurement facets are random. The function does not test these assumptions.- method
"auto"or"mls"for a single score/composite from balanced ANOVA. Explicit"reml_profile"computes approximate component intervals from raw used ratings, for balanced or identifiable incomplete sources; it requires optional lme4 and minqa. It retains original points and reports a separate REML center, but does not supply a sampling SE. Its chi-square calibration is experimental and it is never chosen automatically. For two-score covariance, explicitly choose"gci"(generalized interval with approximate coverage),"regression_region"(conservative normal-model enclosure), or"reml_profile"(experimental joint normal-model profile). The first two require balanced ANOVA. No covariance method is silently selected or substituted after failure."residual_contrast"supplies only the Residual interval: exact chi-square for one score/composite, or a conservative enclosure for two-score covariance, under the normal residual model. It requires raw used ratings, permits incomplete sources, reports a separateIntervalCenter, and does not supply the original estimator's SE. Other components retain their estimates with unavailable intervals. See Residual contrasts below.- draws
Number of pivotal draws for covariance
method = "gci"; default 20000. At least 1000 and at least 100 expected draws in each tail are required. Inspect the numerical endpoint bands, not just this minimum.- seed
Nonnegative integer seed for covariance GCI; the caller's random state is restored.
drawsandseedare rejected for other methods.- ...
Reserved; additional arguments are rejected.
Value
A data frame with Source, selected Score, raw Estimate, SE,
nonnegative-space Lower and Upper, unrestricted RawLower and
RawUpper, Level, Method, and Status. Attributes weights, kind,
assumption, source_design, source_rows, and notes retain context.
Read attr(result, "notes") and save the full result with saveRDS();
a CSV alone does not retain weights and assumptions. The original
G-study is unchanged. Stored mean products, degrees of freedom and design
metadata are required for MLS; raw ratings are not needed for that calculation.
REML profiles instead require raw used ratings and retain PointStatus,
IntervalCenter, SEStatus, CandidateLower/Upper, MethodCode,
Available, Validation, and portable reml_source and diagnostics
attributes. Diagnostics are named in the selected component order, in
standardized-score units; multiply by reml_source$score_scale twice for
a variance or by the two separate scale entries for a covariance.
No live fitting environment is saved. PointStatus is for scalar variances.
Two-score results additionally include Score1, Score2, SEStatus,
score_pair and method-specific diagnostics. Balanced GCI/region results
retain normalized mean_products and optional monte_carlo attributes;
their RawLower/RawUpper equal the signed Lower/Upper.
REML results instead retain the separate center, candidates and profiles.
Covariance intervals have no nonnegative-space intersection.
Residual-contrast results retain IntervalCenter, SEStatus, MethodCode,
Available and Validation, plus a residual_projection attribute with
residual degrees of freedom, rank, scale and numerical checks. They require
retained ratings but save no live fitting environment or projection matrix.
Details
For a source-by-target choice table, see Choose the G-theory target and uncertainty in mfrmr_methods_reference. Component intervals, G/Phi intervals, measurement SEM and paired plan differences have distinct targets.
A component estimates how much scores vary because of persons, conditions, or their interactions. Its SE describes sampling uncertainty in that estimate. Both the component and its SE have squared score units. This SE is different from a D-study's measurement SEM, which is in score units.
Default balanced intervals use the modified large-sample (MLS) method of Ting et al. (1990)
for signed linear combinations of independent ANOVA mean squares, as
detailed by Hess and Iyer (2002, pp. 2–3). The residual component, which
is a single mean square, has the usual chi-square interval. Other
component intervals are approximate, asymmetric and pointwise, not
simultaneous. Normal effects, a balanced design and prespecified score
weights matter: the method is not robust to arbitrary score distributions
or weights chosen after inspecting the data. A numeric ordinal score
does not by itself justify the normal model.
At very low requested confidence levels, squared chi-square corrections
can lose their usual direction; a small level does not guarantee narrow
or well-calibrated MLS limits.
Negative component estimates are retained. RawLower and RawUpper are
the unrestricted MLS endpoints. Lower and Upper intersect that interval
with the nonnegative variance parameter space. A negative lower endpoint
therefore becomes zero, but the point estimate is not changed. If the
entire raw interval is below zero, the intersection is empty: both bounds
are NA with Status = "Empty nonnegative interval", while the raw
endpoints remain visible. It is not replaced by an interval of zero width.
Inspect the design, assumptions and raw estimates in that case.
For MLS, Status = "Includes zero" denotes a nonempty interval containing zero;
"Available" denotes a strictly positive interval. If all mean squares
contributing to a component are zero, its estimated SE is zero but bounds
are unavailable ("Degenerate mean squares"); this is not evidence of
precise population knowledge. "Numerical interval failure" retains the
estimate and SE when the MLS width cannot be evaluated reliably.
A positive interval whose endpoints coincide after rounding instead has
Status = "Variance interval below numeric resolution" (or the corresponding
component-scale status), with missing Lower/Upper. This can occur at an
extremely small requested confidence level. Positive endpoints that overflow
or underflow also remain unavailable. Raw endpoints are retained for diagnosis;
equal raw endpoints in such a row do not establish zero uncertainty.
This method estimates variances of the selected score, including all
covariances needed for a fixed composite. The separate two-score covariance
calculation is described below. Neither supplies G/Phi or plan-difference
intervals. Explicit REML profiles and residual contrasts accept incomplete
sources, with the different scopes described below.
mfrm_multivariate_d_compare() provides a separate
approximation for certain paired plan differences. Use
plot(g, intervals = TRUE, assumption = "normal") to calculate and show
these component intervals directly, with score or weights selecting
the desired score. Its returned data retain the complete interval tables.
Residual contrasts
Use method = "residual_contrast" to ask how uncertain the combined
residual variance or covariance is. It supports the same crossed and nested
source designs, including identifiable incomplete MINQUE(0) sources, when
the observed assignment leaves residual degrees of freedom. It does not
supply intervals for Person, facet or lower-order interaction components
or G/Phi. For a one-facet D-study, confint.mfrm_multivariate_d_study()
can map this interval to relative SEM and its plan differences; the
component result itself remains in squared score units. With one rating per cell, the residual
combines the highest interaction and observation error; it cannot separate them.
Let Z contain all nonresidual incidence columns, including interactions
and the mean. With nu = n - rank(Z) > 0, choose an orthonormal basis H
satisfying H'Z = 0. Under independent homoskedastic normal residuals,
H'Y = H'E and Y'HH'Y has a Wishart distribution with nu degrees of
freedom and residual covariance Sigma_E. Thus for prespecified weights
w, the residual sum of squares divided by w'Sigma_E w is chi-square
with nu degrees of freedom. Its quantiles give exact pointwise limits
for a positive residual variance. The calculation uses QR residuals,
checks rank against singular values and verifies orthogonality, without
forming an observation-by-observation projection matrix. This applies the
standard multivariate regression residual law to the G-study incidence model.
For two scores, the same Wishart block feeds the conservative regression
enclosure described in Between-score covariance elements below. One-degree-of-freedom
or singular pairs instead use marginal variance bounds and Cauchy-Schwarz.
Signed covariance bounds are retained. Coverage is conservative under the
model, not exact equal-tail coverage, and the enclosure can be very wide.
A sparse crossed arrangement can leave few residual contrasts despite
many ratings. Inspect attr(ci, "residual_projection")$df and the limits.
The assignment is treated as fixed; omissions must preserve the residual model. This does not correct selective missingness, heteroskedasticity or dependence between remaining residuals. Normal residuals are essential. Claims are pointwise for prespecified scores/weights, not simultaneous or adjusted for selecting a result after looking at the data.
Estimate retains the original ANOVA/MINQUE component. IntervalCenter
is the separate residual-contrast estimate; the two agree in balanced
ANOVA but can differ for incomplete sources. The original point can lie
outside the interval. SE = NA does not mean zero
uncertainty: this method does not calculate the original estimator's SE.
The scalar chi-square calculation shares the numerical-width checks above;
an unresolved interval retains its original point and projected center.
Use vcov.mfrm_multivariate_gstudy() for its separately qualified sampling
covariance. Both the component and these limits have squared score units.
Zero residual degrees of freedom, numerically unresolved residual variation
or failed projection checks give unavailable limits with explicit Status.
Unsupported component rows remain visible. No unavailable row is a
zero-width interval. Raw ratings and stored components are checked for
agreement; recreating a modified G-study is preferable to editing its fields.
REML component profiles
For example, uncertainty in the Task variance asks how strongly randomly
sampled tasks differ in their average scores. method = "reml_profile"
fits a separate normal random-effects model to the observed assignment:
one common mean and independent Person, facet, interaction and residual
effects. Omissions must be noninformative conditional on that assignment.
It does not correct selective missingness or replace the original MINQUE
estimator. Estimate retains the original component, including negative
values; IntervalCenter is the REML estimate of the same population variance.
The original point can be outside the interval. Neither component matrices
nor original estimates are clipped or repaired.
Write theta = s2 * v, with residual ratio one. For target component j,
constrain tau = theta[j] by setting s2 = tau / v[j]. Restore residual
scale to the profiled restricted criterion using
D(v,s2) = D_profile(v) + (n-1)*(log(s2/s2_hat(v)) + s2_hat(v)/s2 - 1).
Optimize the remaining ratios. At a zero nonresidual target, set that
component exactly to zero and profile the others; the residual remains
strictly positive. The interval uses D - D_min <= qchisq(level, 1).
See the REML section of confint.mfrm_multivariate_d_study() for the
underlying normal model, numerical checks and relationship to ordinary ML
profile intervals. Bates et al. supply the REML criterion, not a finite-sample
validation of this particular G-theory procedure.
Search outward from the REML center and refine the first cutoff crossing
in each direction. This returns a numerical interval around that center;
it does not enumerate remote disconnected accepted regions. Multiple starts,
a second optimizer, and finite-difference checks including zero boundaries
do not certify global optima or rule out narrower undetected crossings.
Unresolved required evaluations, roots or tails leave accepted bounds
unavailable, retaining any resolved CandidateLower/Upper separately.
Reaching a search limit does not justify an infinite bound. A constant
selected score is degenerate, not evidence of zero-width uncertainty.
Weighted scores are scaled together with their weights before fitting;
reciprocal changes of score units and weights preserve the selected composite.
At very small confidence levels, the likelihood-ratio cutoff may be too
small to distinguish from numerical error. Such intervals have missing
bounds and an explicit Status, retaining the original estimate and
representable REML center. For each component, diagnostics[[i]]$cutoff
records the cutoff, endpoint tolerance and deviance resolution. Nonzero
bounds lost when restoring score units are also unavailable; normalized
profile diagnostics remain available. These checks also apply to joint
covariance profiles. They are numerical restrictions, not minimum sample
sizes or evidence of zero uncertainty.
Available describes numerical completion, not statistical coverage.
A limited check reused 40 samples per condition: component true-value
acceptance was 92.5–100% with positive components and 90–100% for checked
zero components, counting numerical failures as misses. The Monte Carlo SE
can reach 4.7 percentage points. These are coarse feasibility results, not
coverage of full endpoint searches or support for a generally recommended
method. The chi-square cutoff is asymptotic; a universal boundary-mixture
correction is not assumed. Intervals are pointwise for prespecified scores
and components, neither simultaneous nor distribution robust.
SE = NA and SEStatus = "Not supplied by profile inversion" mean that
this method did not calculate a sampling SE. The interval width must not
be converted into one by dividing by a normal critical value. RawLower
and RawUpper are inapplicable MLS fields and remain NA; they are not
failed or unrestricted profile endpoints. All reported estimates and bounds
use squared score units. Scalar component intervals cannot be added to
obtain SEM, G/Phi or covariance-element intervals.
Use vcov.mfrm_multivariate_gstudy() separately for sampling SEs of the
original ANOVA/MINQUE component estimates. Those SEs use normal product
moments and do not describe the separate REML estimator or calibrate its interval.
Use plot(g, intervals = TRUE, method = "reml_profile", assumption = "normal")
to compute the intervals and draw the original points in one call. Its
returned data retain the full interval table, including REML centers and
diagnostics. Save that plot object with saveRDS() and use as_ggplot()
after reloading to render it without another fit.
Calculation of the SE
Let MS be the independent ANOVA mean squares, df their degrees of
freedom, and A the linear map from mean squares to raw components.
Under the normal model, df[i] * MS[i] / E(MS[i]) is chi-square.
The sampling covariance is estimated by
A %*% diag(2 * MS^2 / (df + 2)) %*% t(A); SE is the square root
of its diagonal. The squared SE is unbiased for the sampling variance
under this model; the SE itself need not be unbiased. This follows from
E(MS[i]^2) = E(MS[i])^2 * (df[i] + 2) / df[i] and matches the
urGENOVA SEVC convention. The existing paired D-study comparison instead
uses the plug-in denominator df. Its method is unchanged. MLS intervals
are calculated from the mean squares and chi-square/F quantiles, not by
adding and subtracting a normal critical value times this SE.
Between-score covariance elements
For example, score = c("V", "W") estimates how the V and W scores vary
together for each source. A negative covariance can be meaningful; its
interval is signed and is never intersected with nonnegative variances.
Covariance units are the product of the two score units. These are not
correlations, and large covariance alone does not establish a halo effect.
Select the pair before examining its results. Raw negative estimates and
non-positive-semidefinite component matrices are retained without repair.
For each independent mean-product matrix S with df nu, nu*S has a
Wishart distribution under the balanced normal model. Write its entries
as x = S[1,1], c = S[1,2], y = S[2,2]. For nu > 1, an unbiased
estimator of the sampling variance of c is
(nu*x*y + (nu-2)*c^2)/((nu-1)*(nu+2)). Sum these estimates with squared
ANOVA-map coefficients to obtain the component's squared SE. Its square
root need not be unbiased. If a contributing block has df one, this SE
formula is unavailable; SEStatus says so independently of interval status.
Computation scales the scores separately, so a change in their relative
units does not erase the smaller marginal variance. The mean_products
attribute retains normalized entries (x, c, y), the two score_scale
divisors and their product scale; multiply the normalized covariance
column by scale to restore covariance units (use the respective squared
divisors for the two variance columns).
A squared SE can be outside floating-point range even when its square root
is representable; the calculation retains that representable SE.
Unrepresentable endpoints or a positive interval width lost to rounding
produce missing limits with an explicit Status, retaining the original
estimate and any calculable SE. This also applies to residual-contrast
covariance intervals, which retain their separate IntervalCenter.
Generalized interval. Krishnamoorthy and Xia (2007, Section 2) construct
a covariance-matrix pivot C %*% solve(V), where C is the lower Cholesky
factor of the observed sum-of-products matrix and V has independent
Bartlett entries. Its covariance element simplifies to
nu * (c - sqrt(x*y-c^2)*Z/sqrt(U2)) / U1, with independent
U1 ~ chi-square(nu), U2 ~ chi-square(nu-1) and Z ~ N(0,1).
Our extension generates independent pivots for the ANOVA blocks, applies
the signed component map, and takes type-1 empirical quantiles. It does
not filter negative draws or impose component-matrix constraints. Each
contributing block must have df greater than one and a nonsingular pair.
The paper's favorable results for a simple correlation do not establish
exact frequentist coverage for these G-theory covariance components.
The monte_carlo attribute gives 95% joint numerical bands for the two
endpoints of each component interval, using binomial order-statistic bounds.
These bands concern simulation error in the quantiles. They do not measure
source-study uncertainty or establish sampling coverage. More draws reduce
numerical error; they do not resolve insufficient facet levels.
At a very small requested confidence level, the two quantile probabilities
or empirical ranks may coincide. In that case the interval is unavailable
and Status distinguishes numerical probability resolution from an
unresolved interval at the current draw count. Increasing draws may
resolve ranks but cannot restore distinct probabilities lost to rounding.
Conservative enclosure. For each component with K contributing
independent mean-product blocks, give each block coverage gamma = level^(1/K).
When nu > 1 and the pair is nonsingular, the regression-slope t pivot
(df nu-1) is independent of the predictor sum-of-squares chi-square pivot
(df nu). Give each pivot coverage sqrt(gamma). The covariance is the
slope times the predictor variance; enclose their product over that rectangle.
In terms of S, take all products of
c +/- t_quantile*sqrt((x*y-c^2)/(nu-1)) and the two ratios
nu / chi_square_quantile, with equal tails (1-sqrt(gamma))/2.
This expression is symmetric in the scores and respects changes of units.
For a one-df or singular block, use two one-sided marginal variance upper
limits, each with tail (1-gamma)/2, and Cauchy-Schwarz to bound covariance
between plus/minus the square root of their product. Bonferroni protects
this block. Propagate block intervals through the signed ANOVA map. The
independent block events give at least level coverage for the component
under positive marginal variances and normal effects. This is our conservative
construction from standard pivots, not a published G-theory formula attributed
to Krishnamoorthy and Xia. It is pointwise, not simultaneous over components
or score pairs. It can be extremely wide: enclosing nuisance regions adds
conservatism beyond the source design's limited information.
A limited normal-model check covered six small/larger one-facet, crossed and nested sources. A 200-replication GCI screen was followed by four exploratory checks using 2000 saved samples and 8000 pivotal draws each. Their nominal 95% coverages were 94.65%, 94.80%, 99.65% and 96.50% (Monte Carlo SE 0.13–0.50 percentage points). These concern respectively one-facet residual (10 persons, 2 tasks), crossed residual and Task (10 persons, 2 raters, 3 tasks), and crossed Rater (60,4,8) covariances. The small Task interval remained very wide; covariance GCIs involving a one-df block were unavailable. This check does not establish universal coverage or qualify a generally preferred covariance method. Neither method is distribution robust or applies to incomplete MINQUE(0) sources.
plot(g, type = "covariance", score = c("V", "W"), intervals = TRUE, method = "gci", assumption = "normal") displays one signed interval plot
across sources. Without intervals, type = "covariance" retains its matrix
heatmaps. Saved plot data retain the full interval table and numerical bands.
Joint REML covariance profiles
For incomplete sources, explicitly select method = "reml_profile" with
two original scores. This fits both scores jointly, with one mean per score,
independent bivariate normal random effects, a positive-semidefinite matrix
for each component and a positive-definite residual matrix. Omissions must
be noninformative conditional on the observed assignment. This is a different
inference procedure from MINQUE: the original covariance remains Estimate,
while IntervalCenter is the separate joint REML covariance. Both target
the same population quantity. The original point can lie outside the interval.
With score-major observations, let V = sum(Sigma[k] %x% K[k]), where each
K[k] records shared levels, and X = I[2] %x% rep(1,n).
The restricted deviance is log|V| + log|X'V^-1 X| + y'Py plus a constant,
with P = V^-1 - V^-1 X (X'V^-1 X)^-1 X'V^-1.
Fix one off-diagonal component element, optimize all other variances and
covariances, and invert D - D_min <= qchisq(level, 1). No marginal interval
endpoints are combined. Internally, residual whitening permits sparse lme4
evaluation after restoring residual scale and the transformation determinant.
Independent direct-matrix calculations verify that criterion.
Zero covariance is permitted exactly; it does not imply zero marginal
variances. Signed matrix factors preserve positive semidefiniteness during
optimization. Covariance-coordinate derivatives check boundary optimality
as well as ordinary parameter gradients. This numerical parameterization
does not remove the statistical boundary problem (Wu & Neale, 2013).
Multiple starts and these necessary local checks do not prove global optima.
If the initially selected candidate fails these checks, already computed
converged candidates within 1e-7 deviance of the smallest recorded value
are checked in objective order. The first candidate passing every unchanged
gradient, covariance-cone and target-constraint check is used. More distant
local solutions are not substituted. Selected indices and inspected checks
are retained in each fit's selection; no further optimization is triggered.
The returned interval surrounds the REML center and ends at the first checked cutoff crossing in each direction; it does not enumerate remote accepted regions. Unresolved source/constraint fits, roots or tails leave accepted bounds unavailable, preserving numerical candidates separately. A search limit is not an infinite endpoint. Constant or numerically collinear score pairs are degenerate, not evidence of zero uncertainty.
This method is experimental and never selected automatically. Limited balanced normal-model checks used 40 samples per condition and found true-value LR inclusion of 82.5–100%, counting numerical failures as misses (Monte Carlo SE up to 6.0 percentage points). The lowest result concerned Rater covariance with 60 persons, four raters and eight tasks. More persons alone do not increase the number of independent rater effects. These checks do not establish full endpoint-search coverage; incomplete-source coverage is not established. Do not interpret numerical availability as a coverage guarantee or replace the existing balanced methods merely because this method returns a narrower interval. No universal boundary-mixture correction is assumed. The intervals are pointwise and not distribution robust.
SE is NA: profile inversion does not supply sampling SEs for either the
original point or REML center. RawLower/RawUpper are inapplicable here;
CandidateLower/Upper retain exploratory endpoints. All reported covariance
estimates and bounds use products of the score units, retaining negative
signs. Saved diagnostics use standardized units; multiply by both entries
of attr(result, "reml_source")$score_scale to restore score-product units.
References
Stanford University, STATS 305C. Multivariate regression, Distribution results. Normal-model residual Wishart law; the G-study projection is described above.
Wu, H., & Neale, M. C. (2013). On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models. Psychometrika, 78, 441–463. doi:10.1007/s11336-012-9304-2 . Boundary-inference cautions, not a calibration formula for these G-theory covariance-element intervals.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 . Restricted likelihood and sparse computation.
Krishnamoorthy, K., & Xia, Y. (2007). Inferences on correlation coefficients: One-sample, independent and correlated cases. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 137, 2362–2379. doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2006.08.002 . Section 2 supplies the Wishart matrix pivot; component propagation is the extension documented above, with separate finite-sample evaluation.
R Core Team. Random Wishart distributed matrices. Normal sampling representation and elementwise sampling variance.
Ting, N., Burdick, R. K., Graybill, F. A., Jeyaratnam, S., & Lu, T.-F. C. (1990). Confidence intervals on linear combinations of variance components that are unrestricted in sign. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 35(3–4), 135–143. doi:10.1080/00949659008811240 .
Hess, A., & Iyer, H. (2002). A SAS/IML macro for computation of confidence intervals for variance components of mixed models. Proceedings of SUGI 27, Paper 252-27, pp. 2–3. https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings/proceedings/sugi27/p252-27.pdf.
Brennan, R. L. (2001). Manual for urGENOVA, Version 2.1. SEVC and interval definitions, pp. 11–12; Appendix C numerical example, p. 26. Available from CASMA.
Examples
# Long-running workflow; run explicitly when needed.
# example("confint.mfrm_multivariate_gstudy", run.dontrun = TRUE)
if (FALSE) { # \dontrun{
# Published synthetic data: 10 persons, 6 common tasks, scores V and W.
tasks <- read.csv(system.file("extdata", "mgenova-table12.csv", package = "mfrmr"))
g <- mfrm_g_study(tasks, c("V", "W"), rater = NULL)
ci <- confint(g, weights = c(V = .5, W = .5), assumption = "normal")
ci[, c("Source", "Estimate", "SE", "Lower", "Upper", "Status")]
attr(ci, "notes")
# One original score and one component; no new G-study is fitted.
confint(g, parm = "Person", score = "V", assumption = "normal", level = .90)
# Covariance between the two observed scores, retaining its sign.
covariance_ci <- confint(g, score = c("V", "W"), method = "gci",
assumption = "normal")
covariance_ci[, c("Source", "Estimate", "SE", "Lower", "Upper", "Status")]
attr(covariance_ci, "monte_carlo")$endpoint_bands
# Incomplete ratings: a residual-only interval without likelihood fitting.
observed <- tasks[(tasks$Person + tasks$Task) %% 3 != 0, ]
sparse_g <- mfrm_g_study(observed, c("V", "W"), rater = NULL,
method = "minque0")
residual_ci <- confint(sparse_g, parm = "Residual", score = "V",
method = "residual_contrast", assumption = "normal")
residual_ci[, c("Estimate", "IntervalCenter", "Lower", "Upper", "Status")]
attr(residual_ci, "residual_projection")$df
# A separate experimental REML model can address other components.
if (requireNamespace("lme4", quietly = TRUE) && requireNamespace("minqa", quietly = TRUE)) {
profile_ci <- confint(sparse_g, score = "V", method = "reml_profile",
assumption = "normal")
profile_ci[, c("Source", "Estimate", "IntervalCenter", "Lower", "Upper", "SEStatus")]
attr(profile_ci, "notes")
# Two scores require a joint model; this is covariance, not correlation.
joint_ci <- confint(sparse_g, parm = "Person", score = c("V", "W"),
method = "reml_profile", assumption = "normal")
joint_ci[, c("Source", "Estimate", "IntervalCenter", "Lower", "Upper", "Validation")]
}
} # }